Raynovich v. Romanus
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen:
Contrary to the position of the majority, 1 cannot accept the premise that absent a statutory prohibition a borough council may select one of its members to fill a mayoral vacancy, and, on this ground, I respectfully dissent.
It is well established in our law that simply because the Legislature has not expressly prohibited a certain activity by a public official it follows that he may undertake such activity. As was aptly stated in Goodyear v. Brown, 155 Pa. 514, 26 A. 665 (1893) : “. . . it does not follow that everything may be done by a public officer…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Wood v. Town of WhitehallNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Hetrich v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Goodyear v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. GrivettiIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.