Legal Opinion · Dissent

Raynovich v. Romanus

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1973No. Appeal, 107Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen:

Contrary to the position of the majority, 1 cannot accept the premise that absent a statutory prohibition a borough council may select one of its members to fill a mayoral vacancy, and, on this ground, I respectfully dissent.

It is well established in our law that simply because the Legislature has not expressly prohibited a certain activity by a public official it follows that he may undertake such activity. As was aptly stated in Goodyear v. Brown, 155 Pa. 514, 26 A. 665 (1893) : “. . . it does not follow that everything may be done by a public officer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Wood v. Town of WhitehallNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hetrich v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Goodyear v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. People Ex Rel. Scott v. GrivettiIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API