Legal Opinion

Murphy v. School Committee of Brimfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 7, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

The school committees of Brimfield, the Whitman-Hanson Regional District, and Scituate furnish school transportation to resident students attending public schools. They have declined, however, to furnish transportation to resident students attending private schools which are located outside their school districts. Relying on G. L. c. 76, § 1, as amended through St. 1971, c. 875, the compulsory attendance law, several parents of the pupils denied transportation brought actions against their respective school committees. Finding that the public school students travelled at public expense over…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bloom v. School Committee of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Quinn v. School Committee of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  4. Newcomb v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Graves v. Town of FairhavenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. School Committee of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. ColihanMassachusetts Superior Court · 1981
  4. Garon v. Dudley-Charlton Regional School CommitteeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Murphy v. School Committee of BrimfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API