Legal Opinion

Parmelee Pharmaceutical Co. v. Zink

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 1, 1960No. 11114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs claim infringement of Letters Patent 2,478,182, relating to sodium chloride tablets, which was allowed by the Patent Office on August 9, 1949, upon application dated January 16, 1945, filed by plaintiff William V. Consolazio. As allowed, the patent contains this single claim, viz.:

“An internally reinforced sodium chloride tablet comprising compressed granules of sodium chloride; and an internally disposed cellular stroma of a thin, permeable, dialyz-ing film of a materia] selected from the group consisting of cellulose acetate and cellulose nitrate, the cells of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hoskins Mfg. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1913
  3. In re BertschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Rainbow Light, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. In re Sawyer Electrical Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parmelee Pharmaceutical Company, and William v. Consolazio v. Lawrence C. Zink, D/B/A Zink Safety Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API