Legal Opinion

Wil-Fox Manufacturing Co. v. Blair

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1927No. 3627PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Dist. J.,

This is a bill to review the action of the department in refusing a permit to withdraw alcohol. The cause began as a motion for a preliminary injunction. The motion was by consent temporarily held until the department could give a hearing to the applicant and thus make up a record of fact findings. This was followed by insistence upon *231the order of refusal. The cause was then taken up as upon a review of that order. At the request of the defendants, the case was referred back to the department so that further evidence might be introduced. There was again insistence upon the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halpern v. AndrewsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Goldman v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API