State v. Getty
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ODOM, Justice.
Judge Hood wrote an opinion in this case which is copied in the record. It seems to be conceded by counsel for both sides that his statement of the facts and the issues involved is correct. The judge held that under the facts disclosed at the trial the State could not recover and dismissed its suit. The State appealed.
Counsel for the State argued orally before the court and in his brief that the judge erred in his interpretation of the statute involved. We cannot agree with counsel. Our opinion is that Judge Hood’s interpretation of the statute is correct. He has correctly…
2Cited by4 opinions
- GRAND ASSEMBLY, ETC. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Easterling v. Monroe City School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- State v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports1997