Legal Opinion

United States v. Terrance Smith, A/K/A Ty, United States of America v. Rodney Reep, A/K/A Dirty Harry, A/K/A Harry, United States of America v. Karl E. Moore, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2006No. 04-4117Published

1Opinion of the Court

441 F.3d 254

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Terrance SMITH, a/k/a Ty, Defendant-Appellant.

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Rodney Reep, a/k/a Dirty Harry, a/k/a Harry, Defendant-Appellant.

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Karl E. Moore, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-4829.

No. 03-4878.

No. 04-4117.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued September 22, 2005.

Decided March 21, 2006.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ARGUED: Kevin Michael Schad, Schad & Schad, Lebanon,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API