Legal Opinion

Bridgewater v. Worthy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 1982No. 5-91PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLIEBERT, Judge.

Joseph J. Worthy, defendant (hereafter judgment debtor) suspensively appealed from a judgment reviving a previous money judgment in favor of Wanda Sue Bridgewa-ter and Louis Henderson, plaintiffs (hereafter collectively referred to as judgment creditors). The issue presented on the appeal is the trial judge’s dismissal of the peremptory exception of prescription filed by the judgment debtor to the petition for revival. The trial judge concluded the prescription provided for by La.C.C. Article 3547 had not run. We affirm, but not for the same reasons stated by the trial judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Douglass v. GyulaiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Turley v. DreyfusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Lawyers Title Services, Inc. v. BoyleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Galef v. Buena Vista DairyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Galef v. Buena Vista DairyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API