Legal Opinion

Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1925No. 1829. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Appellant issued, to appellee a fire insurance policy for tlie term of one year, through its local agents, Coles Bros. & Saunders, dated October 8, 1924, in the sum of $10,000, upon a cotton gin. On December 4, 1924, the property was totally destroyed by fire. This suit was to recover upon the policy. The case was tried without a jury upon certain agreed facts supplemented by additional evidence, and resulted in judgment against appellant for the full amount of the policy.

The trial court’s findings of fact are as fob lows:

“In making findings of fact, I deem it unnecessary to include either…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wagner & Chabot v. Westchester Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boston Ins. Co. v. RainwaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Camden Fire Ins. v. SutherlandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API