Legal Opinion

Applebaum v. Falco Leasing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1969No. 33441PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

Claiming that the warranty implied from the sale by defendant to plaintiffs of a new motor vehicle had been breached, plaintiffs elected to pursue one of the two *801remedies available to them, Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co., Mo.App., 250 S.W. 2d 830, 832, by returning the automobile and suing to recover the full purchase price of $1575, as well as $400 expended for repairs, or a total of $1975. On a trial without a jury the court found for defendant, and this appeal followed.

Neither party requested the court to file either findings of fact, or “* * * a brief opinion…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Stone v. KiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Jacobson v. Broadway Motors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Hymer v. Dude Hinton Pontiac, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rowe International, Inc. v. J-B Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Fitzgerald v. Don Darr Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MellorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API