Applebaum v. Falco Leasing Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
Claiming that the warranty implied from the sale by defendant to plaintiffs of a new motor vehicle had been breached, plaintiffs elected to pursue one of the two *801remedies available to them, Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co., Mo.App., 250 S.W. 2d 830, 832, by returning the automobile and suing to recover the full purchase price of $1575, as well as $400 expended for repairs, or a total of $1975. On a trial without a jury the court found for defendant, and this appeal followed.
Neither party requested the court to file either findings of fact, or “* * * a brief opinion…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Stone v. KiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Jacobson v. Broadway Motors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hymer v. Dude Hinton Pontiac, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowe International, Inc. v. J-B Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Fitzgerald v. Don Darr Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MellorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988