Legal Opinion

Rae v. Morgan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

There are various assignments of error. We shall not pause at this point to enumerate them, but shall state each separate assignment as we dispose of it.

Session Laws, 1923, Chapter 276, provides that in counties having a population of less than 50,000, the sheriff, with the assistance of the District Attorney, shall foreclose in the name of the county certificates of delinquency upon property outstanding in the name of the county; that in foreclosure proceedings, the summons may be served by publication.

“ * * The name of the person or persons appearing on the latest tax roll in the hands of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marx v. HanthornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Smith v. DwightOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Jory v. Palace Dry Goods Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Coy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Elliott v. ClementOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Knapp v. JOSEPHINE COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Guthrie v. HaunOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Watson v. JantzerOregon Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API