Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Warledo, Johnson Warledo, Thomas Lee Ahaisse, Gary Larney and Meredith Malcolm Quinn

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1977No. 76-1448, 76-1449, 76-1493—76-1495PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

In these appeals from convictions growing out of concerted actions by a group of Indian people against certain railroads, the principal issues are trial errors, including receipt in evidence of a rifle offered for impeachment of one of the defendants as a witness, alleged denial of the right to counsel, and alleged denial of good faith as a defense in connection with Hobbs Act violations.

Each of the above named defendants was found guilty by a jury on three counts of an indictment which charged, first, that as an organization called Seminole Nation Treaty…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. CulbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Brokerage Concepts v. US Healthcare Inc (Part II)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Herman PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Gerald D. CastorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1982

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API