Uship Intellectual Properties, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S CONSTRUCTION OF THE TERM “VALIDATION.”
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.
On April 28, 2011, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion And Order Construing Certain Claims Of United States Patent No. 5,481,464, United States Patent No. 5,831,-220, And United States Patent No. 6,105,014. See USHIP Intellectual Props., LLC v. United States, 98 Fed.Cl. 396 (2011). On May 27, 2011, the Plaintiff (“USHIP”) filed a Motion For Reconsideration of the court’s construction of the term “validation” (“Pl. Mot.”). On June 28, 2011,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- C.R. Bard, Inc. And Davol Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Uship Intellectual Properties, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Hall v. CullinanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023