Legal Opinion

State v. Fitzner

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1993No. Nos. 93-KA-27, 93-KH-100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant, George Scott Fitzner, has appealed and applied for supervisory writs regarding the revocation of his probation for failure to comply with conditions never imposed by the court. He particularly argues the trial judge’s revocation on the basis he did not make regular reports to his probation officer was erroneous. The state concedes. We agree.

At the outset we note that we treat these consolidated matters as an application for supervisory writs in the interest of judicial economy since “the defendant has no right to appeal his probation revocation[.]” State v. Johnson, 592 So.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AbsentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. State v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CraftLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API