Legal Opinion

People v. Yokely

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 2010No. B213003PublishedCited by 13 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Shon Ramone Yokely (defendant) was convicted of murder in 1992. A federal district court granted defendant a writ of habeas corpus based on its findings that defendant’s constitutional rights had been violated because his attorney was not present at a live lineup at which two eyewitnesses identified defendant as the murderer, and because his attorneys had failed to object to admission of the lineup and in-court identifications by those witnesses at defendant’s trial. 1 2 At defendant’s retrial, the trial court independently determined that the testimony of those two…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Golden Door Props., LLC v. Cnty. of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Golden Door Properties v. Co. of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Marriage of Plunkett CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API