Legal Opinion

Gingrich v. Gingrich

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1896No. 17,824PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From tbe Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The lower court sustained demurrers to a cross-complaint and an answer of the appellants, and overruled their motions to modify the judgment and for a new trial. Previously the court had overruled such demurrers, but, at the same term of the court, had set aside its judgment upon such ruling and, as above stated, sustained them. All of such rulings and the action of the court in setting aside its first judgment are assigned as errors, and the discussion includes the question as to the form of said demurrers. The demurrers were informal, but if the pleadings to which they were addressed were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Heilman v. HeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Davidson v. KoehlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Bruce v. BissellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shufeldt v. ShufeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Schrader v. SchraderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Myers v. CarneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lingo v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Wabash Railway Co. v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API