Legal Opinion

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 25, 1917No. 8289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for damages; from Jefferson superior court—Judge Thomas presiding. February 8, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. A railroad company is bound to exercise ordinary care and diligence to prevent communication of sparks from its locomotives. An instruction that a railroad company is required to equip its engines with “up-to-date and standard spark-arresters” is erroneous; the true rule being that the railroad company is to use ordinary care and diligence to apply to its engines the best appliances in general use, the use of which is consistent with the practicable operation of its engines, and to use reasonable care’ and skill in keeping the same in good order. Southern Railway Co. v. Thompson, 129 Ga.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Albany & Northern Railway Co. v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rott v. Provident Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API