Heck v. Collins
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 386, Jan. T., 1912, by John B. Collins and Dorr R. Cobb, from decree of C. P. Potter Co., June T., 1909, No. 1, in Equity, granting discovery and an accounting in case of Albert S. Heck v. John E. Collins, Dorr E. Cobb and W. H. Sullivan. Bill in equity for discovery and an accounting. Before Smith, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 386, Jan. T., 1912, by John B. Collins and Dorr R. Cobb, from decree of C. P. Potter Co., June T., 1909, No. 1, in Equity, granting discovery and an accounting in case of Albert S. Heck v. John E. Collins, Dorr E. Cobb and W. H. Sullivan. Bill in equity for discovery and an accounting. Before Smith, P. J., specially presiding. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. See also Heck v. Collins, 231 Pa. 357. From the record it appeared that the Supreme Court on April 10, 1911, reversed the decree of the court below with a procedendo and directed the court below to permit the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stewart,
The conclusion of the learned chancellor that a partnership relation existed in connection with the sale of the timber land, the subject of the controversy, between himself and the appellants, is clearly derivable from the facts as he has found them. Appellant’s contention is that the findings are not warranted by the evidence. A review and discussion of the evidence on which they *618rest -would prolong unduly this opinion. We do not regard it as necessary. We have carefully studied the evidence and have given careful consideration to the argument on behalf of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Heck v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- Annenberg v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Brown v. BrancatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936