Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. v. Fegen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants ask that we review the trial court’s determination that they breached their fiduciary duty, violated Ethical Rules 1.7 and 2.2, and committed bad faith in connection with their handling of the Fogelman Estate. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
*255BACKGROUND
¶ 2 John Fogelman (“Decedent”) died on March 10, 1997, leaving behind a will naming several beneficiaries. In addition to the assets disposed of in the will, Decedent owned a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The beneficiaries of the life…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Parsons v. Continental National American GroupArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. LivermoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, LurieArizona Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.