Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1997No. Nos. 95-0869, 95-1012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the trial court should have granted his motion to withdraw his plea, because he entered it in reliance on the trial court’s statement that he would be able to appeal the court’s ruling on his motion to suppress. Although it is not entirely clear what the trial court meant when he told appellant he would be able to appeal the motion to suppress, the fact is that appellant cannot appeal. Appellant did not obtain a stipulation that the ruling on the motion to suppress would be dispositive, nor should he have been able to obtain one since it clearly would not have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zambuto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Motes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Zambuto v. Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API