Pray v. Hewitt
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRodgers, J.
This is a suit for specific performance of a contract to deed land. An original bill was filed by the appellant, Hubert E. Pray, now deceased (suit revived in the name of his heirs) in the Chancery Court of Pike County, Mississippi. The contract sought to be enforced was attached as an exhibit to the bill. A great many persons were named defendants because of their mineral inter est in the land, bnt owners of the minerals were released on a demurrer. The appellees, defendants in the trial court, filed their answer denying that they should be required to specifically perform the contract, by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. BagbyMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
- Love v. Mayor Bd. of AldermenMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Gaines v. KennedyMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Darrow v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
- Townsend v. BeaversMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Black v. North Panola School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Cherry v. Anthony, Gibbs, SageMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- David R. Green v. Amerada Hess Corporation and L.A. StricklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Dunaway v. WH Hopper & Associates, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Walton v. BourgeoisMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.