Legal Opinion

Brown-Forman Corp. v. South Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 8, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-1909-15PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This suit for declaratory judgment was brought by Brown-Forman Corporation (hereinafter “Brown-Forman”) to determine the constitutionality of South Carolina Code Ann. § 61-7-100 (Law.Co-op.1976). 1 In addition to seeking a declaration that section 61-7-100 of the South Carolina Code (hereinafter “Affirmation Statute”) violates the commerce clause of the United States Constitution, Brown-Forman sought a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and a permanent injunction enjoining defendants 2 from enforcing this statute and from exercising any remedy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re The Beer InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Brown-Forman Corp. v. New Mexico Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1987
  3. Empire Distributors of North Carolina, Inc. v. Schieffelin & Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1988
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. HealyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API