Legal Opinion

Dumont v. Heighton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1912No. Civil No. 1235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The plaintiff in this case instituted this suit against the defendant, administrator of the estate of Chas. H. Ferry, deceased, on a contract for wages after the term of the contract had expired, alleging a breach thereof by the administrator. The contract was for one year’s services by the plaintiff doing assessment work on twelve mining claims, and taking the proper care of camp and other prop*26erty belonging to deceased Ferry, for which services the plaintiff was to receive $150 per month, beginning January 1, 1910, and ending January 1, 1911. Ferry was to furnish all camp tools and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lacy v. . GetmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. In Re Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Zinnell v. BergdollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellerson v. GroveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. Graybar Electric Company v. McClaveArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Stoll v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API