Legal Opinion
Fahy v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 22, 1988No. 74-87CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*471OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This civilian pay matter is currently before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed herein, the defendant’s motion is granted and the plaintiff’s complaint is to be dismissed.
FACTS
On January 24, 1982, Francis T. Fahy, plaintiff pro se, received an excepted service veterans readjustment appointment to a GS-4 supply clerk position at the San Francisco Regional Office of the United States Customs Service (USCS). Veterans readjustment appointments are made pursuant to statutory authority contained in 5 U.S.C. §§ 3301…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taydus v. CisnerosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Swartz v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988