Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Parker

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Facts Agreed. Replevin. The facts are sufficiently stated iu the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Tapley, J,

From the report in this case,' it appears, that Andrew T. Dole and Franklin 0. Moody, for a time prior to August 7, 1866, were partners in business, under the firm name of Dole & Moody. That, upon the 7th of August, 1866, said Dole died, leaving Moody the survivor. That, upon the 17th day of said August, Jefferson Coolidgo & als., sued out a writ against said Moody, as surviving partner, to enforce a claim due from Dole & Moody, as partners. That the defendant, as sheriff of the county of Cumberland, by virtue of said writ, claimed to attach certain goods which belonged to the late…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrington v. HerrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Richardson v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Davis v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API