Nesbit v. Rose-Hurst Farms, Inc.

The attorneys making this application are not those who represented the plaintiff in this action. It was not their services which led directly to the preservation of the assets of the defendant corporation by the appointment of the receivers. What they did do was to force certain creditors who had received preferences to relinquish the preferences and come into the receivership as general creditors. The claims of those creditors who were forced to give up their preferences amount to nearly two-thirds of the amount of all of the general •claims presented. Accordingly, this is not a situation…