Legal Opinion

Zantzinger v. Weightman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Decided May 15, 1824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was an action upon the case for maliciously holding the plaintiff to bail, upon a ne exeat, for a much larger sum than .was due.

Read the full summary

This was an action upon the case for maliciously holding the plaintiff to bail, upon a ne exeat, for a much larger sum than .was due. The declaration states that the defendants, “ maliciously and injuriously ” intending to cause the plaintiff “ to be, unjustly and without any probable cause, arrested and imprisoned for a large sum of money,” and to cause him, “ without any just or reasonable cause, to expend divers large sums of money on that occasion “ did falsely, unjustly, and maliciously file a bill of complaint,” &c., “ whereupon they prayed a certain process called a ne exeat, and an…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court (ThrustoN, J., absent,)

having fully considered the case, arrested the judgment, because there was no- averment of any act done by the defendants without probable cause; and because, by the plaintiff’s own showing, there was probable cause, to a certain extent.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gredone v. GredoneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Den ex dem. Hoover v. FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1820

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API