Legal Opinion
Capital Temporaries, Inc. Of Hartford, and v. The Olsten Corporation, And
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 17, 1974No. 68, Docket 74-1077PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment entered by the District Court for the District of Connecticut, Hon. M. Joseph Blumenfeld, on October 15, 1973, dismissing the fifth count of the plaintiff’s amended complaint. 365 F.Supp. 888 (D.Conn.1973). The ruling of the district court also denied the plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment on the same count, rejecting plaintiff’s contention that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the defendant, as a matter of law, had imposed a tie-in, illegal per se under section 1 of the Sherman…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- American Motor Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., International Association of Holiday Inns, Intervenor-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.