Legal Opinion

Texaco Exploration & Production, Inc. v. AmClyde Engineered Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2006No. 03-31208PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED for the limited purpose of amending the text in the panel opinion issued on May 5, 2006. In the section of the panel opinion entitled “Conclusion,” the following text is added as footnote 16 at the conclusion of the final sentence of the third paragraph,

Texaco amended its complaint to add as a defendant United Dominion Industries, Inc., a party also named as an AmClyde-related entity defendant in Underwriters’ subrogation action. The district court concluded that United Dominion was not an “other assured,” and accordingly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Texaco Expl & Prodn v. Amclyde Eng Prod CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Francis Barker, Jr. v. Hercules Offshore, Inc., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Crescent Energy Servs., L.L.C. v. Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (In Re Crescent Energy Servs., L.L.C.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API