Antoine v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Following the remand of this case, Antoine v. United States, 8 Cir., 637 F.2d 1177 (1981), the parties again agreed to submit the case to this Court on stipulated documentary evidence. Having given this evidence due consideration, the Court finds that regardless of the cultivation or lack of cultivation of the allotment in issue by plaintiff’s ancestors, judgment in this suit for damages for the loss of the allotment must be entered for plaintiff in the amount of $7,262.
DISCUSSION
I
The ruling law for this case has already been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Creek NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Arenas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Genevieve Pierce, Carrie Pierce McCoy Anna Pierce, Ruth Carmichael Nee Urton, Marcus Pete, Jr., and Elizabeth PeteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Jacob Wallace Antoine, on His Own Behalf and Also on Behalf of His Relatives Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jacob Wallace Antoine, on His Own Behalf and Also on Behalf of His Relatives Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Sablan v. CabreraSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1994