Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1921No. 23,101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

Reginald Shaw and Lyal Beeson were charged jointly with an attempt to commit arson. On a separate trial, Shaw was convicted and appeals.

The state charged and its evidence tended to prove that late in the year 1919, Shaw and Beeson,'as partners, commenced dealing in automobile accessories in Cherryvale. As neither, had any capital, the business was established with money borrowed from a local bank. Shaw purchased a woodén building and lot, paying $2,000 therefor. The partners repaired and painted the building and stocked it with goods valued…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Nickerson v. WinslowWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. State v. BorserineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Minch v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API