Legal Opinion

In re Harmony Q.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 3, 2017No. AC39614PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The respondent father, Carlos Q., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the petitioner, the Commissioner of Children and Families, terminating his parental rights with respect to his daughter, Harmony Q. 1 On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) he had failed to achieve a sufficient degree of personal rehabilitation necessary to encourage a belief that he could assume a responsible position in Harmony's life within a reasonable period of time, 2 and (2) termination of his parental rights was in the best interest of the child. 3…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Michael R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. In re Sydnei V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Harmony Q.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API