Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. King Sports, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-131-TCBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc.’s motion to reduce and apportion costs [136].

On December 8, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company’s motion for summary judgment. On December 13, State Farm submitted its bill of costs requesting $10,549.61.1 That same day, the Clerk taxed Cleveland Golf and co-Defendants King Sports and Jui-Chen Chang for the full amount, $10,549.61.2

*1319Cleveland Golf first argues that in order to ensure a “fair result,” (1) the costs related to service of process should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Ricoh Co., Ltd. Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Baisden v. I'M READY PRODUCTIONS, INC.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  3. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds of London v. Scents CorporationsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  2. JF v. Carnival CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  3. Quiles v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API