Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1981No. 79-927 & 79-928PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These appeals are from orders granting summary judgments and the question presented is whether there was a material issue of fact as to who owned an automobile involved in an accident, and whether the driver of that automobile was an agent of the owner.

The law on the propriety of summary judgments is clear. A summary judgment is properly granted only if the pleadings and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue of material fact on which the summary judgment is sought. The moving party must, therefore, be entitled to the relief sought strictly as a matter of law. It is the moving party's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Jameson v. JamesonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  3. Campbell v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Cashion v. AhmadiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. United States v. BrittenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Wood v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Malmberg v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Houston v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Jones v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API