Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. Thurston

Rochester City Court

Decided December 8, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

The defendant is charged with a violation of section 620 of the Penal Ordinances of the city of Rochester, in that he on October 9,1939, being the owner of an English bull dog of “ dangerous disposition ” did suffer it to run at large.

The defendant with his wife and child reside on Main Street East, next door to Doctor Leve, a witness for the prosecution. The English bull in trim condition tips the scales at three stone. Doctor Leve owns a dog he describes as a “ mongrel,” a scant half the size of the bull. The dogs run at large. No fence separates their respective domains. Neither was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. . ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. People v. GoodwinRochester City Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API