Legal Opinion
Hidalgo, Chambers & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided March 22, 1990No. 10-89-153-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
The question is whether Rule 50(e) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure authorizes the trial court to substitute documents for lost exhibits in a statement of facts without the appellant’s agreement. See TEX.R. APP.P. 50(e). The holding is that the trial court does not have such authority.
On January 10, 1989, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), as receiver of the former Western Bank-Westheimer, recovered a $245,609 judgment against Hi-dalgo, Chambers & Company, Hidalgo, Chambers & Associates, P.C., and Harold Hidalgo and Jerry Chambers (Hidalgo and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re the Estate of Arrendell, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ChathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Born v. Virginia City Dance Hall & SaloonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Rogers v. CIGNA Insurance Co. of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.