Legal Opinion
PEOPLE OF STATE OF NY BY ABRAMS v. Foreman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1993No. 92 Civ. 4884 (RJW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs the People of the State of New York (the “State”) have moved to hold defendants Joseph Foreman (“Foreman”) and Patrick Mahoney (“Mahoney”) and respondent Robert Sehenck (“Sehenck”) in civil contempt for violating two provisions of the injunction (the “Preliminary Injunction”) issued by this Court on July 13, 1992 in People v. Operation Rescue Nat’l, 92 Civ. 4884 (RJW). Following an evidentiary hearing held on October 12 and 13, 1993 (the “civil contempt hearing”), the Court finds Foreman and Sehenck (“the alleged contemnors”) in civil contempt.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Alan Ginsberg and Carlos Ivan PiedrahitaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Powell v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- New York v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995