Legal Opinion

Senior v. Braden

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1935No. 658PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

January 1, 1932 — tax listing day — § 5328-1, the Ohio General Code1 provided that all investments and other intangible property of persons residing within the State should be subject to taxation. Section 5323 so defined “ investment ” as to include incorporeal rights of a pecuniary nature from which income is or may be derived, including equitable interests in land and rents and royalties divided into shares evidenced by transferable certificates. Section 5638 imposed upon productive investments a tax amounting to five percentum of their income yield; and § 5839 defined “ income yield ” so…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. New York Ex Rel. Cohn v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API