Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Pfizer, Inc.

Navajo Nation Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2003No. SC-CV-01-02PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*373Opinion delivered by

FERGUSON, Acting Chief Justice.

This is a products liability case that was dismissed by the Window Rock District Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It concerns the prescription drug Rezulin, which had been used to treat diabetes, a disease prevalent among Native Americans. The question is whether the district court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claim. We hold that subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this case and therefore reverse the district court.

For purposes of its ruling the district court took the following facts in Appellants’ complaint to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Navajo Transport Services, Inc. v. SchroederNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Miles v. Chinle Family CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Begay v. Navajo Engineering & Construction AuthorityNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Kayenta District CourtNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Navajo Housing Authority v. JohnsNavajo Nation Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API