Legal Opinion

The Resolute

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 29, 1926No. A-8028PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action in admiralty.

A libel in rem was filed in this district against the steamship Resolute. Claimant filed a petition under the. fifty-sixth rule in admiralty, impleading Raymond & Whit-comb Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Maine, and having an office and place of business in the borough of Manhattan, city, county, and state of New York. Claimant’s vessel, the steamship Resolute, was seized in this district.

Raymond & Whitcomb Company has no office or place of business in this district, has no officer or agent within this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reilly v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Lake Transfer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. The Troy SoconyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926
  3. Franky Magana v. Stephen Smith, Acting WardenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API