Miller v. Owen
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jose A. Padilla, Jr., J.
In this case of first impression, the sole issue is whether a unit of time measure of damages argument made by plaintiff’s counsel, during his opening statement in this personal injury action, warrants a declaration of a mistrial. Upon oral argument, and its own research, the court makes the following determination:
The purpose of an opening statement is to permit the parties to advance their client’s theory of recovery or defense before the jury. Counsel is permitted to present those facts that can be proven and communicate the issues to the jury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tate v. ColabelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Braun v. AhmedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Paley v. BrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Feldman v. Town of BethelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.