Las Vegas Insurance Adjusters v. Page
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We affirm the summary judgment entered below since there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. NRCP 56(c). The appellant’s claim for money from the respondent was compromised and settled by written agreement between them. The appellant’s effort to avoid the binding effect of that agreement is denied by the record which shows conclusively that the agreement was entered into with full knowledge of all relevant facts.
Affirmed.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnston, Inc. v. WeinsteinNevada Supreme Court · 1972
4Cited by7 opinions
- Lucas v. PageNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Igert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Sibson v. Farmers Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Lucas v. PageNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Razaghi v. Razaghi Development Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.