Legal Opinion

United States v. Meyers

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 20, 1982No. CM 441921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of possession, transfer and sale of hashish, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976). His approved sentence provides for confinement at hard labor for two years, forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for twenty-four months, and reduction to Private E-l.

The appellant has assigned five errors, of which two merit discussion. He contends that the military judge erred by admitting a prior consistent statement by the principal government witness, and that the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. KnickerbockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. TanksleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MeyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. MeyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API