Legal Opinion

Amberson v. Woodul

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 1, 1937No. 10098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SLATTON, Justice.

Appellee, L. E. Woodul, brought this action in the Thirty-Seventh district court of Bexar county, against Joe Amberson, doing business under the name of Union Bus Lines, for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while a passenger in one of the busses operated by appellant as a common carrier. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee and against appellant for the sum of $3,500.

The appellant first complains of the action of the trial court in refusing to declare a mistrial on account of the fact that during the cross-examination of the appellee,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConleyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Holloway v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Green v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. International-Great Northern R. v. IcingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Parks v. San Antonio Traction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Triangle Cab Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Skyline Cab Co. v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Goldstein v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Southwestern Freight Lines v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Hyde v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API