Legal Opinion

Harriot v. United States

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02963Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Michael Own Harriot, C/A No. 1:19-cv-2963-JFA-SVH Plaintiff, vs. ORDER United States, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Michael Owen Harriot (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings a claim against the United States (“Defendant”) pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (“FTCA”). Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and Local Civ. Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d) (D.S.C.), this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings. Thereafter, Defendant asserted a motion to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional CorporalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API