Legal Opinion

Impac Mortgage Holdings v. Timm

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 2020No. 2119/18PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. v. Curtis J. Timm, et al., No. 2119, September Term 2018. Opinion by Nazarian, J. BREACH OF CONTRACT – CONTRACT INTERPRETATION – OBJECTIVE VIEW – EFFECT GIVEN TO EACH CLAUSE Under objective view of contract interpretation, clause in Articles Supplementary governing the number of preferred shareholder votes required to amend the Articles was susceptible of only one meaning and was not ambiguous. Language requiring that the consent of at least two-thirds of one class of preferred shareholders—as opposed to two- thirds of both classes counted together—was required…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. RRC Northeast, LLC v. BAA Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Impac Mortgage Hldgs. v. TimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Aqua Acceptance, LLC v. The Pelican Group Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  3. Bennett v. Ashcraft & Gerel, LLPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Bennett v. Ashcraft & Gerel, LLPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  5. Bennett v. Ashcraft & Gerel, LLPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API