Legal Opinion
Spickler v. Dube
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 19, 1986No. Civ. 84-0059 PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTACHMENT AND TRUSTEE PROCESS
GENE CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert D. Spickler seeks to institute trustee process against, and to attach the property of, Defendant Roger P. Dube. The circumstances under which this Court may grant an attachment are governed by the law of the state in which the district court sits. Fed.R.Civ.P. 64. Diane Holly Corporation v. Bruno & Stillman Yacht Co., Inc., 559 F.Supp. 559, 560 (D.N.H.1983). Under Maine law, a party seeking a prejudgment attachment must demonstrate a reasonable likelihood…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Bowman v. DussaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Anderson v. Kennebec River Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Herrick v. ThebergeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Pineland Lumber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bolduc v. National Semiconductor Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1998
- Clapp v. Northern Cumberland Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1997
- NAES CORPORATION v. COASTAL RESOURCES OF MAINE LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- Spickler (Robert D.) v. Dube (Roger P.) (2 Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988