Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Nationwide Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 21, 1962No. 95PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The right to recover damages resulting from a wrongful interference with a contract for personal services has long been recognized. Haskins v. Royster, 70 N.C. 601; Jones v. Stanly, 76 N.C. 355; Arkansas v. Texas, 346 U.S. 368, 98 L. ed. 80; Edwards v. Dowdy, 70 S.E. 2d 608; Lurie v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 1 N.E. 2d 472; Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 214 N.W. 754, 84 A.L.R. 35; Childress v. Abeles, 240 N.C. 667, 84 S.E. 2d 176, and the numerous authorities there cited.
For the purpose of this appeal it may be conceded that plaintiff’s evidence relating to the breach of the contract of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Arkansas v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lurie v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Burgess v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Brinkley & West, Inc. v. Foremost Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Allied Distributors, Inc. v. Latrobe Brewing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Penney v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.