Legal Opinion

Ordinary of New Jersey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 26, 1945No. 8687Published

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

This is the second time this case has been before us. Originally it had been tried by a district judge, sitting without a jury, who found in favor of the defendant. We reversed the judgment because there were no findings of fact by the court below. We remanded the cause so that the District Court might make such findings of fact and conclusions of law, 3 Cir., 136 F.2d 536. The judge who had tried the case died before he had the opportunity to attend to this. Thereafter, another district judge, under the heavy handicap of not having heard the matter, after reviewing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Sooy v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879
  4. Borden v. Wolf Silk Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. Koch v. CostelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API