Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Stuart
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 20, 1977No. 2-58202PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINGS, Justice.
On this appeal petitioner seeks greater economic redress than is provided by trial court’s dissolution of marriage decree. We affirm.
Erma L. Stuart, petitioner, and Jack W. Stuart, respondent, had been married about 28 years and the record shows both made substantial contributions to the relationship.
The marriage was dissolved by a July 25, 1974 decree. August 2, 1974, respondent moved to reconsider and for a new trial. Petitioner resisted the reconsideration motion but joined in seeking a. new trial. November 7, 1974, hearing was held upon what trial court deemed a motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schantz v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Locke v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- In Re the Marriage of WillcoxsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Zinger v. ZingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- In Re the Marriage of JanssenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984