Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cousin v. Page

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1978No. Nos. 12188, 12189Published

1DissentEdwards, Judge

I dissent from the opinion and holding of the majority because I believe that the Travelers policy afforded coverage in this instance.

The critical issues presented are: 1) whether or not Janice Batiste, who applied for the policy, gave false statements to the insurance agent; 2) whether or not the false statements (if any) were made with an intent to deceive and were material to the risk assumed; 3) whether or not Janice possessed an insurable interest; and 4) whether or not Janice gave Shedrick Keys permission to use the insured vehicle so as to afford coverage to the “second permit-tee”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. American Home Assurance Company v. CzarnieckiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  3. Gay v. United Benefit Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Hughes v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Fruge v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance SocietyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API